A single record for every platform request
Listing coordination brings project information and platform requests into one composed working record. It can cover a new aggregator profile, a verification request, an explorer correction, wallet information or an exchange inquiry. Each destination is treated as a separate task, rather than one broad promise of visibility.
The first review maps what is already public, what needs correction and what the team wants to address next. A named point of contact keeps the work moving and gives your team one place for questions. For requests involving CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko, we organize the relevant project facts and supporting links before preparing the submission.
This arrangement suits teams preparing for launch, managing several open requests or correcting public information after a project change. You remain the authority on project facts. Nothing is submitted until the designated contact has approved the materials.
The destination determines what belongs in the file
The materials follow the destination: an aggregator request is not an explorer update, and neither is an exchange inquiry. This distinction keeps the preparation focused and makes your approval specific to the work in hand.
| Format | Best suited to | What we need from you |
|---|---|---|
| Aggregator listing or profile correction | A public reference profile needs adding or correcting | Approved project facts, official links and existing profile URLs |
| Explorer information update | Token details or presentation need attention on an explorer | Network, correct contract address and logo assets where relevant |
| Wallet information or inclusion | Wallet presentation is part of the user journey | Logo files and official project references |
| Exchange inquiry | Your team is ready to approach a venue | Project and company materials requested by that venue |
For broader tracker coverage, we can coordinate listings on other crypto trackers. If the request concerns an explorer or wallet, the separate token information and logo update and wallet logo and token list inclusion routes help define what should be prepared.
What should be settled before a request leaves the desk?
A request is easier to prepare when the project has one approved source for its public facts. Before drafting, we compare the token name, ticker, network, contract address, project description and official links for consistency. Any unresolved point is returned to your team rather than written as an assumption.
The working file may also include logo assets, existing platform profiles and correspondence already received. If a supply question is involved, the team should provide the relevant information for circulating supply verification. If current profiles already contain errors, listing profile remediation may fit better than a new application.
A migration or rebrand needs a clear account of what changed and which public records are affected. Share the transition details before preparation begins, so the same approved explanation can accompany each relevant request. Your contact sees the draft first; the team’s written sign-off is the point at which it may be submitted.
The arrangement in four parts
The work proceeds through four defined steps, with approval kept in your hands. Your named contact maintains the request record and reports the latest known status in the agreed format.
- Map the requests. We collect existing profile links, the desired outcome for each destination and any correspondence already open.
- Check the source information. We compare supplied facts and assets, then identify missing details or conflicts for your team to resolve.
- Prepare for sign-off. A draft is presented for your approval before anything is sent. We keep confidential project material within the working process and do not treat an unapproved version as final.
- Coordinate and record. After approval, we handle the agreed submission and follow-up, noting what was supplied and the latest visible status.
Where a public profile can be checked, we compare it with the approved information after an update. The record also separates requests awaiting your team from those awaiting a platform response. That gives your team a useful handover without adding unnecessary circulation of project details.
A private route from assessment to action
The right starting point is the information gap, not the longest possible platform list. A missing aggregator profile, a conflicting public record and a contract change call for different requests. Where relevant, the work can sit alongside a DEX listing and liquidity setup, a launchpad listing or another distinct listing need.
Your named contact keeps the sequence composed: first the project facts, then the destination, then the approval. The team receives a concise account of submitted materials and open follow-up, with discretion over what is shared beyond the people handling the request.
For an initial conversation, the useful detail is the chain or network involved, alongside any existing profile links. Your named contact will map the relevant requests and explain what needs your sign-off before preparation begins.
Frequently asked questions
Which project details are useful for the first conversation?
The project website, token name and ticker, network, contract address, official social links and existing platform profiles provide a useful starting record. Include the destination and intended correction or application. Your named contact can then identify missing details before drafting, while your designated approver remains responsible for confirming project facts.
Can an existing CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko profile be corrected?
Yes. We can identify the public information that needs attention, prepare the proposed update and coordinate the relevant request. Your team supplies the accurate replacement details and supporting links, then approves the draft. If several existing profiles need coordinated corrections, the work can be organized as a remediation route.
How does CoinMarketCap community verification differ from supply verification?
They address different requests, so they should be prepared separately. Community verification concerns the project’s community profile, while circulating supply verification concerns supply information. We identify the destination and requested outcome first, then assemble the materials your team can substantiate and approve.
Can one submission update a token across several platforms?
Usually, each destination requires its own request and relevant information. A shared approved source helps keep details consistent, but it does not make an aggregator profile, explorer record, wallet display and exchange inquiry the same task. Your contact tracks them separately and presents each draft for sign-off.
How long should we allow for listing coordination?
The preparation schedule follows the completeness of your materials, the number and type of requests, and the team’s approval timing. A platform’s response schedule is separate from our coordination work. After the initial review, your contact can set out the preparation sequence and report open requests without promising a platform decision date.
Can you assure us that a platform will approve the request?
No. Each platform controls its own eligibility review, decision and public profile display. We can undertake the agreed preparation, submission coordination and follow-up, and keep a record of those actions. Your contact will distinguish completed work from any decision that remains with the platform.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…